Sunday, November 06, 2005

Inverse Logic?

Let's say that it's 1943. You are lead general of the allied powers fighting against Germany. The world depends on you to take down the evil dictator and restore peace to Europe. OK, so its time to plan a strategy. After all, it won't be easy to topple this dastardly dynamo. In the War Room, your chief advisor asks you, "Sir, where should we place our troops for the attack on Berlin?

You decide to station them on the island of Tazmania off the southern coast of Australia.

If this had actually happened during World War II, people around the world would have been furious at your choice. For, why would you put all your troops in a location that's thousands of miles away from where the enemy is? Many would say that you used inverse logic.

Reading that scenario, you probably asked yourself, "What the hell is this psycho talking about?" and closed your internet browser window. Some of you, however, thought to yourself "Why would anyone do such a stupid thing?"

Unfortunately, such "inverse logic" is still being used today in the city of Boston. As of 2004 here are the rider statistics for daily boarding on the T are:

Blue Line: 55,000 passengers
Orange: 160,000 passengers
Red: 214,000 passengers
Green: 225,000 passengers

This statistic, as seen published in the "Not For Tourist's Guide to Boston", was recently revealed to me by a reader of this blog. I was dumbfounded and appalled. Why would the MBTA place such little emphasis on the line that, per day, has the most passengers?

The Red Line and Blue Line are sights of beauty. Their trains, seemingly infinite in length, are efficient, fast, and clean. The Orange Line is just long. But, see if you can follow me here...

The Green Line is quite the opposite. It's one-car cabooses chug along the tracks like Thomas the Tank Engine after chugging a bottle of quaaludes. Unlike Thomas, though, I've never seen a Green Line trolley with a smile on it's face or a word of educational inspiration to youngsters. Moreover, the green line is inefficient, unpredictable, prone to breakdowns and delays, crowded, and in my opinion has the ubiquitous smell of B.O and Limburger Cheese.

The state of the Green Line today might be suitable for a small suburban town of about 40,000 people. Heck, it might even be suitable for Worcester. But, by no means is the Green Line suitable for a city the size of Boston and its outlying burroughs. There is no logical reason why the MBTA shouldn't be placing a higher emphasis on improving the green line over the other lines. In my reasoning it is simple: the best line should be the one that most people ride. It's not rocket science people.

Now, I know some "Red Liners" will tell me that they despise their line as well. They won't understand how I could say that their line is best. But to these people I offer one final challenge: live on the green line for a year. Then we'll talk.


13 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The MBTA obviously can't change the Green Line from trolleys to trains like the Red, because of a few things:

(1) It was built as the first subway in America using trolleys... hence the small tunnels and sharp turns.

(2) It operates aboveground on streets for most of it's routes, hence it must be a trolley.

What they CAN do, in my opinion is:

(1) Upgrade their signal system. The fact that the trains have to stop every 10 feet in the tunnels is ridiculous.

(2) Run longer trains more often. I live on the B line, and this summer they ran 3-car trains often. It was great. The wait for a train was a little longer, but more people could get on each one and they moved a LOT faster in the tunnels since there was the same number of people, but on fewer trains.

(3) Put some signal prioritization on Comm Ave and Beacon St. It's incredibly frustrating to be on a train that finally finishes boarding just as the light turns red, only to have to wait even longer for a light cycle to complete. They also need to adjust the traffic lights in general to sense when cars are present more accurately so that you don't end up with green lights on crossroads where there is NO traffic!

These are just my thoughts. Anyone have any others?

12:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the signal system in the subway ensures the trains don't slam into each other.....upgrading or changing the system wouldnt do anything it just means there would be less signals but you would have to wait longer for the train in front of you to clear..i think stopping and going "every ten feet" would be less annoying than sitting for 2 minutes every hundred feet.

3:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

this is a different person than the last anonymous.

The key here is that the green line has four branches, but the red line has two. This means that average 1.5 cars on each green line branch is six cars together. One red line car is smaller than one green line car. So in green line terms, the red line has about 3.5 cars on each branch which is equal to six red line cars. There are two branches on the red line, so it all together runs the equivalent of seven green line cars compared to the green lines six.

The amount of cars is less, but not drastic. Improvments are still needed.

1. Increase cars to three in peak hours and two in off-peak hours. This would leave it a bit less overcrouded.

2. Pay before boarding. When the T eliminated stops, something more was still needed. For pre-paying to work, all stations need to be upgraded with turnstiles and a booth. The stations would be fenced around with entrances on either side. The fences would have vertical bars only, so people cannot jump over them. All doors would now be open to speed boarding and to lower the cost of improving each station, some more stops would be removed.

Blandford street
BU west
Pleasent street
griggs street
and on the c line
brandon hall

3. wheel chair improvments. As much as the Bredas suck, something had to have been done to make the green line accesable to wheel chairs. All stations would have wheel chair accesability with the improvments.

4. Signal improvments are ok, but they would make traffic on comm ave and beacon much worse. A better idea would be to decrease the amount of road crossings. More cars would be at each crossing, but the T wouldnt have to slow down as much.

5:36 PM  
Blogger Tyler said...

I really like the suggestion to add turnstiles and token booths to all above ground stations. The amount of time that is wasted by waiting for grandpa jones to fish that silver dollar out of his pocket really hurts the commute time.

6:37 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Second anonymous, I absolutely agree that they need to eliminate more stops on the B line. The ones you proposed are good suggestions.

Regarding paying before you board, I agree with that too, but I don't know that it would work without having T employees watching each stop. I think the CharlieCard upgrade which is happening relatively soon can help. Hopefully most riders will get the rechargable smartcards that they just have to wave in front of the money machine when they board, which will speed up boarding somewhat.

10:58 PM  
Blogger Tyler said...

but the charliecard isn't going to prevent john and jane q. tourist from bogging down travel times as they search through their wallets for $1.25 in nickels.

1:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I love blogs like yours, I wish it had more about wheelchairs
like ##lLINK## does.

9:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Green Line's biggest problem is Copley Junction, the flat track intersection just past Copley Station. At this location, outbound E trains must cross all incoming B, C, & D trains. The capacity of this junction limits the number and size of trains that they can run - if you want to add a B, C, or D train you lose an E train. To solve this problem you must either build a separate tunnel for the E line or eliminate the E line. Personally, I think they should build the urban ring, which would reduce demand on the E line and allow fewer trains.

11:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's a great story. Waiting for more. digital camcorder shopping printing pregnancy and effexor xr thomson crt projector schematic antidepressant

1:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Where did you find it? Interesting read Body cart 1955 chevrolet Hair loss tip wash hair every day Porn try out How to start a internet advertising agency Pornstars galleries.com Long and fat black dicks pregnant animate girls cheap keen shoes Free anal domination preggo panty Pics anime ranma porn

3:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey,

What is it with girls fighting?

BigMike


gross-videos.com

3:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

ACNE MEDICINE ONLINE
buy acutane
WHAT IS ANTHELMINTICS
order Albenza
ANTIBACTERIAL MEDICINE & CARE
buy amoxil online
AMPICILLIN ONLINE
ampicillim
BUY CHEAP BACTRIM
bactrim ds
NEW DRUGS & PILLS… SUPER-VIAGRA…
CHEAP CIALIS
BUY CIPRO ONLINE
cipo
BUY CHEAP DIFLUCAN ONLINE
DIFLUCAN ONLINE

6:16 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

BUY CIALIS ONLINE
index.html
WHAT IS VIAGRA
BUY CHEAP VIAGRA ONLINE.DYSFUNCTION ERECTILE MEDICATION MEDs
BUY CIALIS ONLINE
BUY CHEAP VIAGRA + LOW-COST CIALIS & GET SPECIAL BONUS...
WOMAN VIAGRA
BUY LOW-COST VIAGRA.DYSFUNCTION ERECTILE NEW MEDS
ACNE MEDICINE ONLINE
buy acctane
WHAT IS ANTHELMINTICS
cheap Albenza
ANTIBACTERIAL MEDICINE & CARE
amoxil side effects
AMPICILLIN ONLINE
amicillin
BUY CHEAP BACTRIM
buy bactrim without prescription
NEW DRUGS & PILLS… SUPER-VIAGRA…
LOW-COST CIALIS
BUY CIPRO ONLINE
ciro
BUY CHEAP DIFLUCAN ONLINE
cheap diflucan
BUY CHEAP SUPER VIAGRA ONLINE AND SAVE 70 % OF MONEY...
DISCOUNT LOW-COST CIALIS VIAGRA LEVITRA
BUSINESS CREDIT CARDS ONLINE

8:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home